🔗 Share this article

January 30th, 1972 remains among the most deadly – and significant – dates throughout three decades of violence in the region.

In the streets where it happened – the memories of that fateful day are visible on the buildings and etched in public consciousness.

A public gathering was held on a wintry, sunny afternoon in the city.

The protest was opposing the practice of internment – imprisoning people without due process – which had been implemented in response to an extended period of violence.

Soldiers from the specialized division killed thirteen individuals in the Bogside area – which was, and still is, a strongly Irish nationalist area.

A particular photograph became particularly iconic.

Pictures showed a religious figure, Father Daly, using a stained with blood cloth as he tried to shield a group carrying a youth, the injured teenager, who had been killed.

Media personnel documented considerable film on the day.

Historical records contains Fr Daly telling a media representative that soldiers "just seemed to discharge weapons randomly" and he was "completely sure" that there was no reason for the shooting.

That version of what happened wasn't accepted by the original examination.

The initial inquiry found the Army had been attacked first.

Throughout the peace process, Tony Blair's government set up a new investigation, after campaigning by surviving kin, who said Widgery had been a whitewash.

In 2010, the findings by Lord Saville said that on balance, the paratroopers had initiated shooting and that none of the victims had posed any threat.

The then Prime Minister, the Prime Minister, issued an apology in the House of Commons – stating fatalities were "without justification and unjustifiable."

Authorities commenced examine the matter.

An ex-soldier, referred to as the accused, was charged for killing.

He was charged regarding the fatalities of the first individual, 22, and in his mid-twenties the second individual.

The defendant was further implicated of attempting to murder multiple individuals, additional persons, Joe Mahon, another person, and an unknown person.

Remains a legal order preserving the soldier's privacy, which his legal team have argued is required because he is at danger.

He stated to the investigation that he had exclusively discharged his weapon at individuals who were possessing firearms.

The statement was rejected in the concluding document.

Information from the inquiry could not be used straightforwardly as testimony in the legal proceedings.

In the dock, the veteran was hidden from public using a privacy screen.

He addressed the court for the opening instance in the hearing at a session in late 2024, to respond "innocent" when the charges were put to him.

Kin of those who were killed on Bloody Sunday journeyed from the city to the courthouse daily of the trial.

A family member, whose sibling was fatally wounded, said they understood that hearing the trial would be painful.

"I can see the events in my memory," he said, as we examined the main locations discussed in the proceedings – from Rossville Street, where Michael was killed, to the adjoining the courtyard, where James Wray and another victim were fatally wounded.

"It even takes me back to my location that day.

"I helped to carry my brother and put him in the medical transport.

"I went through every moment during the evidence.

"But even with experiencing the process – it's still valuable for me."